Lolles v. Bank of America et al
| Devin Lolles |
| Bank of America and Northstar Location Services LLC |
| 5:2022cv00959 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Scott L Palk |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Bank of America answer due 1/27/2023. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 12/28/22. (ms)
|
| Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Bank of America. (Harmon, Joel) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Joel W Harmon on behalf of Bank of America (Harmon, Joel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Waive Local Counsel Requirement. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 12/2/22. (ms)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave TO WAIVE LOCAL COUNSEL REQUIREMENT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF by Devin Lolles. (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Jeffrey A Wilson on behalf of Devin Lolles (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4028069. (Wilson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America, Northstar Location Services LLC filed by Devin Lolles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ekw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
