Hawks v. El Habti
| Loretta Hawks |
| Warden Aboutanaa El Habti |
| 5:2022cv01036 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| Charles Goodwin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Loretta Hawks in the amount of $5, receipt number 500000345 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mailed receipt to Loretta Hawks MCLOUD-MBCC C3C-201 29501 Kickapoo McLoud, OK 74851 (rr) |
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that Petitioner's Motion, ECF No. #5 be DENIED and that she be ordered to prepay the full $5.00 filing fee for this action to proceed. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice to re-filing unless Petitioner pays the $5.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned magistrate judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 1/9/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 12/23/2022. (mc)
|
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Loretta Hawks. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER -- The Court is in receipt of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Petitioner has tendered in the referenced case. In order for this action to proceed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or be granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Petitioner shall cure the deficiencies designated above no later than December 30, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 12/13/2022. (mc)
|
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge Charles Goodwin on 12/9/2022. (kmt) |
| Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kmt) |
| Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 Petition, #3 Enter Order to: Loretta Hawks MCLOUD-MBCC C3C-201 29501 Kickapoo McLoud, OK 74851 (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Loretta Hawks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Completion, #2 Exhibit B - Final Order, #3 Exhibit C - Order Declining Jurisdiction, #4 Envelope)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hawks v. El Habti | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Loretta Hawks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Aboutanaa El Habti | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
