Conner v. Oklahoma State of
| Claudia C Conner |
| Oklahoma State of doing business as Oklahoma Employment Security Commission |
| 5:2022cv01095 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REPLY by Defendant Oklahoma State of re #10 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Oklahoma State of. (Grose, Justin)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support, #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Lewis Journal Entry)(Hammons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Oklahoma State of. (Grose, Justin)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER finding as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant State of Oklahoma d/b/a Oklahoma Employment Security Commission filed a motion to dismiss ("Motion") [Doc. No. 6]. Plaintiff Claudia C. Conner timely filed an amended complaint [Doc. No. 7] under Rule 15(a)(1)(B), thereby "supersed[ing] the original and render[ing] it of no legal effect." The Court therefore DENIES AS MOOT the Motion [Doc. No. 6]. Signed by Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 01/12/23. (rr)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE (other) by All Plaintiffs re #6 MOTION to Dismiss of Mootness (Hammons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by All Plaintiffs.(Hammons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss by Oklahoma State of. (Grose, Justin)
|
|
Filing 5
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by All Plaintiffs. (Hammons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
ENTRY of Appearance by Amber L Hurst on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hurst, Amber)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTRY of Appearance by Mark E Hammons on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hammons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
ENTRY of Appearance by Justin P Grose on behalf of Oklahoma State of (Grose, Justin)
|
|
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4056783. (Grose, Justin)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oklahoma County District Court, case number CJ-2022-5699 filed by Oklahoma State of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Return of Summons, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Amber Hurst EOA, #5 Exhibit 5 - Mark Hammons EOA, #6 Exhibit 6 - State Court Notice, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(km)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conner v. Oklahoma State of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Claudia C Conner | |
| Represented By: | Amber L Hurst |
| Represented By: | Mark E Hammons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oklahoma State of doing business as Oklahoma Employment Security Commission | |
| Represented By: | Justin P Grose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
