Eason v. 1008 Enterprises INC et al
Plaintiff: Christopher D Eason
Defendant: 1008 Enterprises INC doing business as Budget Inn Hotel and Rakesh Gandhi doing business as Budget Inn Hotel
Case Number: 5:2023cv00024
Filed: January 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Bernard M Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2023 Filing 11 STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET Status/Scheduling Conference set for 4/6/2023 10:20 AM in Rm 3018 before Judge Bernard M. Jones. Status Report due by 3/27/2023. (dwl)
February 23, 2023 Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Maria G Escobar on behalf of All Defendants (Escobar, Maria)
February 23, 2023 Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Maria G Escobar on behalf of All Defendants (Escobar, Maria)
February 23, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants.(Curran, Jeffrey)
February 23, 2023 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Jeffrey A Curran on behalf of 1008 Enterprises INC, Rakesh Gandhi (Curran, Jeffrey)
February 21, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher D Eason. Rakesh Gandhi served on 2/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit return receipt- certified mail)(Johnson, Tyler)
February 21, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher D Eason. 1008 Enterprises INC served on 2/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return receipt- certified mail)(Johnson, Tyler)
January 20, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to 1008 Enterprises INC, Rakesh Gandhi. (rr)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ~ Granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Plaintiff,therefore, is authorized to proceed without prepayment of the fees or giving security for such payment. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 1/10/2023. (dwl)
January 9, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher D Eason. (rr)
January 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1008 Enterprises INC, Rakesh Gandhi filed by Christopher D Eason. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eason v. 1008 Enterprises INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher D Eason
Represented By: Tyler C Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1008 Enterprises INC doing business as Budget Inn Hotel
Represented By: Maria G Escobar
Represented By: Jeffrey A Curran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rakesh Gandhi doing business as Budget Inn Hotel
Represented By: Jeffrey A Curran
Represented By: Maria G Escobar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?