Cox et al v. TJ Inspection Inc
Shawn Cox |
TJ Inspection Inc |
5:2023cv00187 |
February 24, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Charles Goodwin |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 REPLY by Plaintiffs Shawn Cox, Shawn Cox re #35 MOTION to Certify Class (FLSA Notice) Or Alternatively, Amend Complaint filed by Shawn Cox(individually), Shawn Cox(on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Am. Notice Docs)(Moulton, David) |
Filing 37 RESPONSE in Opposition re #35 MOTION to Certify Class (FLSA Notice) Or Alternatively, Amend Complaint filed by TJ Inspection Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(McMahon, Cathleen) |
Filing 36 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Shawn Cox, Shawn Cox Re: #35 MOTION to Certify Class (FLSA Notice) Or Alternatively, Amend Complaint (Moulton, David) |
Filing 35 MOTION to Certify Class (FLSA Notice) Or Alternatively, Amend Complaint by Shawn Cox(individually), Shawn Cox(on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, Wickson Decl., #2 Exhibit 3, Vacha Decl., #3 Exhibit 4, Cox Decl., #4 Exhibit 5, Tome Decl., #5 Exhibit 6, Notice Docs, #6 Exhibit 7, Am Complaint, #7 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Moulton, David) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 31 NOTICE (other) by Shawn Cox(individually), Shawn Cox(on behalf of all others similarly situated) of Filing Consent (Moulton, David) |
Filing 30 DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2023 10:20 AM telephonically before Judge Charles Goodwin. Status Report due by 5/31/2023. (jb) |
Filing 29 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiffs Shawn Cox, Shawn Cox. (Moulton, David) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 26 NOTICE (other) by Shawn Cox(individually), Shawn Cox(on behalf of all others similarly situated) of Filing Consent (Moulton, David) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Continue Status and Scheduling Conference by TJ Inspection Inc. (McMahon, Cathleen) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Order Excusing Local Counsel Requirement by TJ Inspection Inc. (McMahon, Cathleen) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 21 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney / Withdrawal of Ryan Pittman, Mark Temple, Peter Stuhldreher, Paul Knettel, Christopher Thrutchley by TJ Inspection Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment proposed Order)(Pittman, Ryan) |
Filing 20 ENTRY of Appearance by Cathleen W McMahon on behalf of TJ Inspection Inc (McMahon, Cathleen) |
Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert A Bragalone on behalf of TJ Inspection Inc (Bragalone, Robert) |
Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard J Burch on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Burch, Richard) |
Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by David I Moulton on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Moulton, David) |
Filing 16 DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 5/3/2023 11:40 AM telephonically before Judge Charles Goodwin. Status Report due by 4/26/2023. (jb) |
Filing 15 ENTRY of Appearance by Christopher S Thrutchley on behalf of TJ Inspection Inc (Thrutchley, Christopher) |
Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by Ryan A Pittman on behalf of TJ Inspection Inc (Pittman, Ryan) |
Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by TJ Inspection Inc . (Pittman, Ryan) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by TJ Inspection Inc.(Pittman, Ryan) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Local Counsel by Shawn Cox(individually). (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Burch, Richard) |
![]() |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by David I Moulton on behalf of Shawn Cox(individually) (Moulton, David) STRICKEN on 3/17/2023 (jb). |
![]() |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by David I Moulton on behalf of Shawn Cox(individually) (Moulton, David) STRICKEN on 3/14/2023 (jb). |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number AOKWDC-4108486 by Shawn Cox(individually). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Court Admittance, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Moulton, David) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to TJ Inspection Inc. (kb) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4103806. (Burch, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TJ Inspection Inc filed by Shawn Cox(individually), Shawn Cox(on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox et al v. TJ Inspection Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shawn Cox | |
Represented By: | Richard J Burch |
Represented By: | David I Moulton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TJ Inspection Inc | |
Represented By: | Christopher S Thrutchley |
Represented By: | Robert A Bragalone |
Represented By: | Cathleen W McMahon |
Represented By: | Ryan A Pittman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.