Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
Omayra Romero |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
5:2023cv00385 |
May 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Suzanne Mitchell |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION RECORD filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 ALJ Dec. & ODAR Hearing Transcript, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Disability Related Development, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2, #9 Medical Records Part 3, #10 Medical Records Part 4, #11 Medical Records Part 5, #12 Medical Records Part 6, #13 Medical Records Part 7, #14 Medical Records Part 8, #15 Medical Records Part 9)(Webber, Narissa) |
Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Narissa C Webber on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Webber, Narissa) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Waive Requirement of Local Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/22/23. (lb) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Supplemental Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/22/23. (lb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave RELIEF FROM RULE LCvR83.3 REQUIRING ASSOCIATION WITH LOCAL COUNSEL by Omayra Romero. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service)(Konoski, Bryan) |
Filing 6 ENTER ORDER. Mr. Konoski must comply with LCvR83.3 no later than 5/30/23. Entered by direction of Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/15/23. (lb) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Omayra Romero. (Konoski, Bryan) |
Filing 4 ORDER regarding #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must supplement her application on or before 5/24/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/10/23. (lb) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Bryan M Konoski on behalf of Omayra Romero (Konoski, Bryan) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Omayra Romero. (kb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Social Security) against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Omayra Romero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Omayra Romero | |
Represented By: | Bryan M Konoski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Narissa C Webber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.