Simpson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner: Michael Laroy Simpson
Respondent: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Case Number: 5:2023cv00437
Filed: May 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Gary M Purcell
Referring Judge: David L Russell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2023 Filing 9 DECLARATION titled, "Declaration Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 1746" by Michael Laroy Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - 4-5-2023 Receipt, #2 Envelope)(ekw)
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER for Response re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Laroy Simpson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 7/5/2023. (rb)
July 3, 2023 Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Michael Laroy Simpson in the amount of $5, receipt number 500002648 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mailed receipt to Michael Laroy Simpson #163563 HELENA-JCCC 216 N. Murray St. Helena, OK 73741-9606 (rr)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTER ORDER. The Court construes the Affidavit as a request for extension of time to pay the filing fee and grants the same. Accordingly, Petitioner shall pay the $5 filing fee or submit a completed Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis no later than July 7, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 6/16/23. (cps)
June 6, 2023 Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Laroy Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Inmate's Request for Disbursement of Legal Costs, #2 Exhibit 2 - Verification, #3 Exhibit 3 - Envelope, #4 Exhibit 4 - Sworn Affidavit, #5 Exhibit 5 - CIV-20-985-J Complaint, #6 Envelope)(ekw)
May 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall cure the deficiencies designated above by the 12th day of June, 2023. Otherwise, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. The Court Clerk is directed to provide the Petitioner the appropriate in forma pauperis motion form and 28 U.S.C. 2254 form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 5/24/2023. (cps)
May 18, 2023 Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Signed by the direction of Judge David L. Russell on 05/18/2023. (naa)
May 17, 2023 Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases (naa)
May 17, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Laroy Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Article, #2 Exhibit 2 - Grievance, #3 Exhibit 3 - Grievance Response, #4 Exhibit 4 - Restoration of Credits, #5 Envelope)(naa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Laroy Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?