Royal v. Emerson-Gomez et al
| Tony Royal |
| Mary Emerson-Gomez and Edward L Gaylord |
| 5:2023cv00468 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Charles Goodwin |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Tony Royal. (rr) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Jessica L Dark on behalf of Mary Emerson-Gomez, Edward L Gaylord (Dark, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Charles A Schreck on behalf of Mary Emerson-Gomez, Edward L Gaylord (Schreck, Charles) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Mary Emerson-Gomez, Edward L Gaylord. (Schreck, Charles) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tony Royal. Mary Emerson-Gomez served on 6/27/2023; Edward L Gaylord served on 6/27/2023. (rr) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Mary Emerson-Gomez, Edward L Gaylord. (rr) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Charles Goodwin on 05/25/2023. (jb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony Royal. (rr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mary Emerson-Gomez, Edward L Gaylord filed by Tony Royal. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Supporting Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
