Cain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
| Audra Cain |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 5:2023cv00569 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Shon T Erwin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT -- In accordance with the order entered this date, the decision of defendant, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/14/2023. (mc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion to Remand to SSA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/14/2023. (mc)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (kmt) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge by Audra Cain. (kmt) |
| Filing 4 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remand to SSA by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Baltz, Shefali) |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION RECORD filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 ALJ Dec. & ODAR Hearing Transcript Part 1, #3 ALJ Dec. & ODAR Hearing Part 2, #4 ALJ Dec. & ODAR Hearing Transcript Part 3, #5 Payment Documents and Decisions, #6 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #7 Non Disability Related Development, #8 Disability Related Development, #9 Medical Records Part 1, #10 Medical Records Part 2, #11 Medical Records Part 3, #12 Medical Records Part 4, #13 Medical Records Part 5, #14 Medical Records Part 6, #15 Medical Records Part 7, #16 Medical Records Part 8, #17 Medical Records Part 9, #18 Medical Records Part 10, #19 Medical Records Part 11, #20 Medical Records Part 12, #21 Medical Records Part 13, #22 Medical Records Part 14, #23 Medical Records Part 15, #24 Medical Records Part 16, #25 Medical Records Part 17)(Baltz, Shefali) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Shefali Baltz on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Baltz, Shefali) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4196162. (Knapp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Social Security) against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Audra Cain. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(naa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Audra Cain | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas-Hohn Knapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Shefali Baltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
