Sexton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Eldon Sexton
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Case Number: 5:2023cv00674
Filed: July 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Charles Goodwin
Referring Judge: Amanda Maxfield Green
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Eldon Sexton (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rp)
September 20, 2023 Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice to the re-filing for Plaintiff's failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2023. This Report and Recommendation terminates the referral of this matter to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 9/20/2023. (rb)
September 19, 2023 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, as to Eldon Sexton (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Mail Returned Contents) (rp)
September 15, 2023 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Amended Complaint filed by Eldon Sexton, #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eldon Sexton, #4 Order, as to Eldon Sexton (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Mail Returned Contents) (rr)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before September 18, 2022, Plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $112.16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 8/28/2023. (rb)
August 21, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eldon Sexton. Motions referred to Amanda Maxfield Green. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rr)
August 21, 2023 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Oklahoma Department of Corrections filed by Eldon Sexton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rr)
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to Cure Deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 8/2/2023. (rb)
August 1, 2023 Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green. Signed by the direction of Judge Charles Goodwin on 08/01/23. (rr)
August 1, 2023 Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (rr)
August 1, 2023 Notice of Mailing LCvR5.4/Change of Address form, #1 Complaint, #3 Order to Eldon Sexton #219221 GRANITE-OSR P O Box 514 Granite, OK 73547 (rr)
July 31, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Oklahoma Department of Corrections filed by Eldon Sexton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sexton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eldon Sexton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?