Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
Plaintiff: Michael Dean Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2023cv00694
Filed: August 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Amanda Maxfield Green
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2023 Filing 13 JUDGMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 9/18/2023. (rb)
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Remand to Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 9/18/2023. (rb)
September 15, 2023 Filing 11 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (kmt)
September 15, 2023 Filing 10 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge by Michael Dean Smith. (kmt)
September 14, 2023 Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remand to SSA by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Baltz, Shefali)
September 13, 2023 Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION RECORD filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 ALJ Dec. & ODAR Hearing Transcript, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Disability Related Development, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2)(Baltz, Shefali)
September 13, 2023 Filing 7 STRICKEN ENTRY of Appearance by Kelsey Young on behalf of Michael Dean Smith (Young, Kelsey) Stricken on 9/18/2023 (rb).
September 11, 2023 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Shefali Baltz on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Baltz, Shefali)
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Waive Requirement for Association of Local Counsel; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 8/9/2023. (rb)
August 8, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Michael Dean Smith. (Parmele, Daniel)
August 8, 2023 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel A Parmele on behalf of Michael Dean Smith (Parmele, Daniel)
August 8, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Dean Smith. (dtb)
August 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Social Security) against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Michael Dean Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Dean Smith
Represented By: Daniel A Parmele
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Shefali Baltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?