Edwards v. Oklahoma State Reformatory et al
Plaintiff: Leellis Edwards
Defendant: Oklahoma State Reformatory and Scott Crow
Case Number: 5:2023cv00716
Filed: August 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Stephen P Friot
Referring Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2023 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Leellis Edwards. The undersigned recommends the Court dismiss this case without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/24/2023. This report and recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 10/3/23. (lb)
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $25.26 by 9/26/23. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments until he has paid the full $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall not issue process until further order of the Court, and the Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the agency having custody of Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 9/5/23. (lb)
September 5, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leellis Edwards. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Offender Statement Report, #2 Envelope)(naa)
August 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER regarding #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court orders Plaintiff to cure the deficiencies by 9/5/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 8/15/23. (lb)
August 14, 2023 Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 08/14/2023. (kb)
August 14, 2023 Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Stephen P. Friot for all further proceedings. Judge Patrick R Wyrick no longer assigned to caseSigned by the direction of Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 08/14/2023. (kb)
August 14, 2023 Filing 3 PREVIOUS Cases (kb)
August 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leellis Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb)
August 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Crow, Oklahoma State Reformatory filed by LeEllis Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(kb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Oklahoma State Reformatory et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leellis Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma State Reformatory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?