Goodwin v. Goldey
Petitioner: Eullis Monroe Goodwin
Respondent: Kris Goldey
Case Number: 5:2023cv00773
Filed: September 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Shon T Erwin
Referring Judge: Patrick R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING #6 the Report and Recommendation, Denying #2 the Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Recommitting this case to Magistrate Judge Erwin for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 10/5/2023. (ks)
September 20, 2023 Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Eullis Monroe Goodwin in the amount of $5, receipt number 500003669 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Receipt mailed to Eullis Monroe Goodwin #46370-074 EL RENO-FCI P O Box 1500 El Reno, OK 73036 (dtb)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that Petitioner's Motion, ECF No. #2 be DENIED and that he be ordered to prepay the full $5.00 filing fee for this action to proceed. This report and recommendation terminates the referral to the undersigned magistrate judge unless and until the matter is re-referred. Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 9/11/2023. (mc)
September 11, 2023 Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc)
September 1, 2023 Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 9/1/2023. (kb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 4 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eullis Monroe Goodwin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 1 FSA Time Credit Assessment, #2 Exhibit 2 - Inmate Request to Staff, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Robert Teegarden, #4 Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Johnathon Granger, #5 Envelope)(kb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eullis Monroe Goodwin. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Inmate Transactions, #2 Envelope)(kb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eullis Monroe Goodwin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Informal Resolution Form, #2 Exhibit 2 - Rejection Notice Administrative Remedy 02212023, #3 Exhibit 3 - Regional Administrative Remedy Appeal, #4 Exhibit 4 - Rejection Notice Administrative Remedy 03292023, #5 Exhibit 5 - Rejection Notice Administrative Remedy 05122023, #6 Envelope)(kb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodwin v. Goldey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eullis Monroe Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kris Goldey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?