Chaney v. Stitt et al
Larry Chaney |
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck, Scott Williams and Allen McCall |
5:2023cv00824 |
September 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Amanda Maxfield Green |
David L Russell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SECOND ORDER to Cure Deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 11/1/2023. (rb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Chaney. Motions referred to Amanda Maxfield Green. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ekw) |
Filing 5 ORDER to Cure Deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green on 9/25/2023. (rb) |
Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green. Signed at the direction of Judge David L. Russell on 9/18/2023. (dtb) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David L. Russell for all further proceedings. Judge Scott L. Palk no longer assigned to case. Signed at the direction of Judge Scott L. Palk on 9/18/2023. (dtb) |
Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases (dtb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adam Luck, Allen McCall, Larry Morris, Kevin Stitt, Scott Williams filed by Larry Chaney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Letter from Project Commutation, #2 Envelope)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.