Jet Air Inc v. Alliance Air Parts Inc
| Jet Air Inc |
| Alliance Air Parts Inc |
| 5:2023cv00899 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Timothy D DeGiusti |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Alliance Air Parts Inc . (Donnell, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to Complaint by Alliance Air Parts Inc.(Donnell, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 15
ENTRY of Appearance by Gary Allan Gardner on behalf of Jet Air Inc (Gardner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 14
ENTRY of Appearance by Alex Whitman on behalf of Jet Air Inc (Whitman, Alex)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Gary Gardner. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 11/22/2023. (jee)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Alex Whitman. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 11/22/2023. (jee)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Due 12/6/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 11/22/2023. (jee)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time by Alliance Air Parts Inc. (Donnell, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 9
ENTRY of Appearance by Bradley K Donnell on behalf of Alliance Air Parts Inc (Donnell, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 8
ENTRY of Appearance by Jennie M Mook on behalf of Alliance Air Parts Inc (Mook, Jennie)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gary Gardner Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4299279 by Jet Air Inc. (Fitzgerald, Craig)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4299141 by Jet Air Inc. (Fitzgerald, Craig)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued Electronically as to Alliance Air Parts Inc. (ekw)
|
|
Filing 4
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Jet Air Inc . (Fitzgerald, Craig)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTRY of Appearance by Craig A Fitzgerald on behalf of Jet Air Inc (Fitzgerald, Craig)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued Electronically as to Alliance Air Parts Inc. (ekw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Alliance Air Parts Inc filed by Jet Air Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ekw)
|
|
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4269153. (Fitzgerald, Craig)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jet Air Inc v. Alliance Air Parts Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jet Air Inc | |
| Represented By: | Craig A Fitzgerald |
| Represented By: | Alex Whitman |
| Represented By: | Gary Allan Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alliance Air Parts Inc | |
| Represented By: | Bradley K Donnell |
| Represented By: | Jennie M Mook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
