Drew v. United States Postal Service et al
| Courtney S Drew |
| United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and Kathleen DePaul |
| 5:2023cv00900 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Timothy D DeGiusti |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Order as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 10/12/2023. (mc)
|
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Courtney S Drew Motions referred to Shon Erwin.Signed by the direction of Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/10/2023. (naa) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Courtney S Drew. (naa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas J Blum, Kathleen DePaul, Bernadette Morgan, United States Postal Service filed by Courtney S Drew. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Letter of Decision, #2 Exhibit 2 - USPS Policy, #3 Exhibit 3 - Hearing date, #4 Exhibit 4 - Response to hearing, #5 Exhibit 5 - Doctors note #1, #6 Exhibit 6 - Doctors note #2, #7 Exhibit 7 - Former manager on plaintiffs performance, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(naa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
