Whitehorn v. Credit Collection Services
Terrance Whitehorn |
Credit Collection Services |
5:2023cv00982 |
October 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Stephen P Friot |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER STRIKING #10 Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's December 7, 2023 order. Plaintiff may re-file the Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, without first filing a motion for leave to amend, if plaintiff complies with the court's December 7, 2023 order and files the Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial on or before December 18, 2023. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 12/08/2023. (dtb) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Credit Collection Services filed by Terrance Whitehorn.(House, Nkem) |
Filing 9 ORDER. Because 21 days have not yet passed since the filing of dft's responsive pleading, the court finds that plf may amend his complaint once as a matter of course and his motion for leave to amend is unnecessary. The court therefore STRIKES #7 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, without prejudice to re-filing should plf fail to file the amended complaint within the 21-day period. Plf is DIRECTED to make corrections to the amended complaint, as fully set out in this order. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 12/7/2023. (llg) |
Filing 8 TELEPHONIC STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/8/2024 09:15 AM before Judge Stephen P. Friot. Status Report due by 1/3/2024. (llg) |
Filing 7 FIRST MOTION for Leave To Amend by Terrance Whitehorn. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Amended Complaint)(House, Nkem) |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Credit Collection Services . (Bragalone, Robert) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants.(Bragalone, Robert) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Fareshteh H Hamidi on behalf of All Defendants (Hamidi, Fareshteh) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert A Bragalone on behalf of Credit Collection Services (Bragalone, Robert) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE 00982-f Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4287702. (House, Nkem) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Credit Collection Services. (dtb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credit Collection Services filed by Terrance Whitehorn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Whitehorn v. Credit Collection Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terrance Whitehorn | |
Represented By: | Nkem Amadi House, Sr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credit Collection Services | |
Represented By: | Fareshteh H Hamidi |
Represented By: | Robert A Bragalone |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.