Sherfield v. The Village Police Department et al
| DeAngelo Sherfield |
| The Village Police Department |
| 5:2023cv01107 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Patrick R Wyrick |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeAngelo Sherfield. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Miscellaneous Filing, #2 Envelope)(kb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by DeAngelo Sherfield (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE (other) by DeAngelo Sherfield (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeAngelo Sherfield. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Supporting documents, #2 Envelope)(kb) |
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court's Order it is recommended that his Motions ECF Nos. #2 and #6 be DENIED and that he be ordered to prepay the full $405.00 filing fee for this action to proceed. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed unless Plaintiff pays the $405.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of any order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 2/5/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 1/19/2024. (mc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeAngelo Sherfield. (kb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER -- The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs ECF No. #2 . However, the Application is deficient. Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated above by submitting an amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on or before January 5, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 12/19/2023. (mc)
|
| Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DeAngelo Sherfield Motions referred to Shon Erwin. Signed by the direction of Judge Patrick R Wyrick on 12/7/2023. (kb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by DeAngelo Sherfield (kb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeAngelo Sherfield. (kb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Village Police Department filed by DeAngelo Sherfield. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Supporting documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sherfield v. The Village Police Department et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DeAngelo Sherfield | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Village Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
