Minarik et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Minarik
Defendant: Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner: Calvin E Mein
Case Number: 5:2024cv00014
Filed: January 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Stephen P Friot
Referring Judge: Bernard M Jones
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to link his individual PACER account to this court in order to request e-filing access and then electronically files an entry of appearance, consistent with LCvR83.4. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 1/31/2024. (dtb)
January 31, 2024 Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Adam M. Apton Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4347978 by Calvin E Mein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Mark)
January 31, 2024 Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Mark A Smith on behalf of Calvin E Mein (Smith, Mark)
January 29, 2024 Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Craig Zieminski on behalf of All Defendants (Zieminski, Craig)
January 29, 2024 Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert Ritchie on behalf of All Defendants (Ritchie, Robert)
January 29, 2024 Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by K. Virginia Burke DeBeer on behalf of All Defendants (DeBeer, K. Virginia)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to link his individual PACER account to this court in order to request e-filing access and then electronically file an entry of appearance, consistent with LCvR83.4. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 1/26/2024. (dtb)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to link his individual PACER account to this court in order to request e-filing access and then electronically file an entry of appearance, consistent with LCvR83.4. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 1/26/2024. (dtb)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to link his individual PACER account to this court in order to request e-filing access and then electronically file an entry of appearance, consistent with LCvR83.4. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 1/26/2024. (dtb)
January 26, 2024 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of K. Virginia Burke DeBeer Filing fee $ 100, receipt number BOKWDC-4344352 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DeBeer's Request for Paycom's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Smith, Spencer)
January 26, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Robert P. Ritchie Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4344335 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ritchie's Request for Paycom's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Smith, Spencer)
January 26, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig E. Zieminski Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4344285 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 C. Zieminski's Pro Hac Vice Request)(Smith, Spencer)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER for Stipulation and Order to Extend Time and Stay Deadlines. Without waiving any affirmative defenses and otherwise reserving all rights, Defendants accept service. All pre-trial deadlines that may apply in the Action (including any obligation of Defendants to respond to any pending complaint in the Action) are stayed pending the appointment of the lead plaintiff and lead counsel and the entry of an order governing further proceedings. Within 14 days after the entry of an order appointing lead plaintiff and lead counsel, lead counsel and counsel for Defendants shall confer on a proposed schedule for filing an amended complaint or designating the operative complaint and for briefing on any motions or response relating thereto. Signed by Judge Stephen P. Friot on 1/25/2024. (dtb)
January 23, 2024 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Paycom Software Inc . (Smith, Spencer)
January 23, 2024 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Elke C Meeus on behalf of All Defendants (Meeus, Elke)
January 23, 2024 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael F Lauderdale on behalf of All Defendants (Lauderdale, Michael)
January 23, 2024 Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Spencer F Smith on behalf of All Defendants (Smith, Spencer)
January 9, 2024 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by William B Federman on behalf of Joseph Minarik(individually) (Federman, William)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ~ Case reassigned to Judge Stephen P. Friot for all further proceedings. Judge Bernard M. Jones no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 1/9/2024. (dwl)
January 9, 2024 PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AOKWDC-4330914. (Federman, William)
January 5, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Craig Boelte, Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison. (naa)
January 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Craig Boelte, Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison filed by Joseph Minarik(individually), Joseph Minarik(on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(naa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minarik et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Minarik
Represented By: Laurence M Rosen
Represented By: Phillip Kim
Represented By: William B Federman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paycom Software Inc
Represented By: Craig Zieminski
Represented By: Elke C Meeus
Represented By: K. Virginia Burke DeBeer
Represented By: Michael F Lauderdale
Represented By: Robert Ritchie
Represented By: Spencer F Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Richison
Represented By: Craig Zieminski
Represented By: Elke C Meeus
Represented By: K. Virginia Burke DeBeer
Represented By: Michael F Lauderdale
Represented By: Robert Ritchie
Represented By: Spencer F Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Boelte
Represented By: Craig Zieminski
Represented By: Elke C Meeus
Represented By: K. Virginia Burke DeBeer
Represented By: Michael F Lauderdale
Represented By: Robert Ritchie
Represented By: Spencer F Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Calvin E Mein
Represented By: Mark A Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?