Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Happy Monk LLC et al
| Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
| Chaoran Tang, Happy Monk LLC doing business as Happy Monk Club and Scott Tang |
| 5:2024cv00063 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Scott L Palk |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by Joe Hand Promotions Inc . (Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Ryan R Janis on behalf of Joe Hand Promotions Inc (Janis, Ryan) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. The Court, however, reserves the right to reinstate the requirement should it appear local counsel would be helpful in the adjudication and/or resolution of this case. Signed by Judge Scott L. Palk on 2/15/2024. (cps)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Happy Monk LLC, Chaoran Tang. (dtb) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AOKWDC-4339632. (Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Happy Monk LLC, Chaoran Tang filed by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
