Nolan v. Davis et al
| Edford Ray Nolan, Jr |
| Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department |
| 5:2024cv00487 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Jodi W Dishman |
| Suzanne Mitchell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edford Ray Nolan, Jr. Motions referred to Suzanne Mitchell. (lb) |
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Edford Ray Nolan, Jr. The Clerk of Court is directed to refile this hybrid filing as an in forma pauperis motion. The Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee, and to that extent the motion is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $18.53 by 6/4/24. The Clerk of Court shall not issue process until further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 5/14/24. (lb)
|
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 05/14/24. (rp) |
| Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (rp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bradley Davis(Individual Capacity), Bradley Davis(Official Capacity), Enid Police Department filed by Edford Ray Nolan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
