Roe v. Quintessa LLC
| Tonya Roe |
| Quintessa LLC doing business as Quintessa Marketing |
| 5:2024cv00492 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Bernard M Jones |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pla expert witness list and expert reports due 11/5/2024; Dft expert witness list and expert reports due 11/20/2024; Pla witness list due 11/5/2024; Dft witness list due 11/20/2024; Pla exhibit list due 11/20/2024; Dft exhibit list due 12/5/2024; Motions in limine due 3/1/2025; Jury instructions due 3/1/2025; Voir dire requests due 3/1/2025; Trial briefs due 3/1/2025; Discovery due by 1/5/2025. Jury Trial set for 4/8/2025 09:30 AM in Courtroom 303 before Judge Bernard M. Jones. Motions due by 12/1/2024. Pretrial Report due by 3/1/2025. The Status Conference set for July 3, 2024 is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 6/24/2024. (dwl)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Plaintiff Tonya Roe. (Hopson, Dustin) |
| Filing 7 STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET ~ Status/Scheduling Conference set for 7/3/2024 11:15 AM in Room 3018 before Judge Bernard M. Jones. Status Report due by 6/24/2024. (dwl) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Quintessa LLC.(McCaslin, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ~ Granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline is extended to June 4, 2024. Signed by Judge Bernard M. Jones on 5/21/2024. (dwl)
|
| Filing 4 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Present Other Defenses by Quintessa LLC. (McCaslin, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - LLC by Quintessa LLC . (McCaslin, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Benjamin M McCaslin on behalf of Quintessa LLC (McCaslin, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oklahoma County District Court, case number CJ-2024-2717 filed by Quintessa LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - EOA for Hopson, #4 Exhibit 4 - EOA for Neathery, #5 Exhibit 5 - Return of Service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(naa) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AOKWDC-4433069. (McCaslin, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roe v. Quintessa LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Quintessa LLC doing business as Quintessa Marketing | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin M McCaslin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tonya Roe | |
| Represented By: | Dustin J Hopson |
| Represented By: | Amy Steele Neathery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
