Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
Chris Elroy Loveless |
Jeff Sifers, Bill Dydee and Oklahoma State of |
5:2024cv00858 |
August 21, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Jodi W Dishman |
Chris M Stephens |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #5 Order filed by Chris Elroy Loveless. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rp) |
Filing 6 Receipt for Money Received from Chris Elroy Loveless in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 500008336 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mailed receipt to Chris Elroy Loveless #113446014 CHICKASHA-GCJ 215 N 3rd St Chickasha, OK 73018 (naa) |
![]() |
Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by the direction of Judge Jodi W. Dishman on 08/21/24. (rp) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jodi W. Dishman for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti no longer assigned to case. Signed by the direction of Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 08/21/24. (rp) |
Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases (rp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Chris Elroy Loveless. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.