McNall et al v. Rogue Valley Medical Center, et al
Plaintiff: Michael McNall and Karyl McNall
Defendant: Rogue Valley Medical Center, Credit Bureau of Josephine County Inc and Christopher Mecca
Case Number: 1:2007cv03075
Filed: September 12, 2007
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Medford Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Mark D. Clarke
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER: Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion for Attorney Fees 174 and awards plantiffs $7060.00 in attorney fees and $547.60 in nontaxable expenses, totaling $7607.60. Ordered & Signed on 2/22/11 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (kf)
September 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 165 Order. Signed on 09/23/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
August 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER: Granting Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 154 ; Denying Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 159 . The court will set a scheduling conference to discuss resolution of the damages issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke on 8/19/2010. (plb)
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER: It is Ordered that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to file Amended Complaint 106 is DENIED; Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 102 is DENIED; Defendants' Motions to Strike 116 and 121 are MOOT; Defendan t Mecca's Motion for Summary Judgment 66 is GRANTED; and Defendant Credit Bureau of Josephine County's Motion for Summary Judgment 70 is DENIED as to Count Three (15 USC § 1692e) and GRANTED as to all other counts. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 02/05/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNall et al v. Rogue Valley Medical Center, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael McNall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karyl McNall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rogue Valley Medical Center
Represented By: Christopher D Mecca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credit Bureau of Josephine County Inc
Represented By: Christopher D Mecca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Mecca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?