Waring Park v. Ashland District Ranger (U.S. Forest Service)
Waring Park |
Ashland District Ranger |
1:2008cv03034 |
March 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Medford Office |
Jackson |
Owen M. Panner |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 Order. Defendant's motion to dismiss 31 is granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 12/1/09 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dmd) |
Filing 39 ORDER: Plaintiff's motions for an injunction and change of venue 36 ) are denied. Ordered by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dmd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Waring Park v. Ashland District Ranger (U.S. Forest Service) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Waring Park | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ashland District Ranger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.