Riley v. Gooch et al
| Stefanie Riley |
| Joseph Daniel Gooch, Ted Duell and Bonnie Duell |
| 1:2009cv01019 |
| August 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford Office |
| Klamath |
| Owen M. Panner |
| None |
| International Child Abduction Remedies Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Riley established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ZVG was "wrongfully retained" in the United States. Neither Gooch nor the Duells established an affirmative defense. Thus, under the convention, I ordered ZVG's prompt return to Germany, her country of habitual residence. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Signed on 01/29/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jw)
|
|
Filing
65
Order Granting Petitioner's Petition for Return of Child to Habitual Residence. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and Signed on 12/15/2009 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (rsm)
|
|
Filing
8
Temporary Restraining Order (access hyperlink for specific terms and conditions) which includes direction to the United States Marshal for service of Summons and supporting documents upon Respondents; directs filing of written submissions no later than 11/2/2009; sets a hearing for 1:30PM on 11/3/2009 and sets a court trial for 1:30 PM on 12/14/2009. Signed on 10/21/2009 at 3:00PM by Judge Owen M. Panner. (wk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
