Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation v. J&P Acquisition, Inc. et al
| Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation |
| J&P Acquisition, Inc., Donald Hachenberger and Glenda Hachenberger |
| 1:2009cv03056 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford Office |
| Jackson |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 28 is adopted. Defendants Donald Hachenberger's and Glenda Hachenberger's motion to dismiss 19 is granted without prejudice, with leave to re-file against Defendants Hachenberger in Delaware. The claims against Defendant J&P Acquisition remain unchanged. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered and signed on 12/17/2009 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jw)
|
|
Filing
28
Findings & Recommendation: Defendants Hachenberger's motion to dismiss 19 should be granted. The complaint against Donald and Glenda Hachenberger should be dismissed without prejudice. The Court should grant leave for Plaintiff to refile aga inst Defendants Hachenberger in the state of Delaware. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 12/11/2009. If objections are filed, any responses to the objections are due 10 days after the objections are filed. Ordered and signed on 11/20/09 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
