Shell v. Thomas

Shell v. Thomas

Defendant:	Warden J.E. Thomas
Petitioner:	Brandon Shell
Case Number:	1:2010cv01192
Filed:	September 29, 2010
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Medford Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark D. Clarke
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 7, 2010	Filing 8 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 5 ; Denying as Moot Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 ; and Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 . Signed on 12/7/10 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dmd)
October 6, 2010	Filing 5 Findings & Recommendation: Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 should be Denied as moot, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 2 should be denied without prejudice, Application for Leave to Proceed IFP 1 should be denied as moot. The parties sh all have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file a response to the objections. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 10/21/2010. Signed on 10/6/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (dkj)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 7, 2010

Filing 8 ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 5 ; Denying as Moot Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 ; and Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 . Signed on 12/7/10 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dmd)

October 6, 2010

Filing 5 Findings & Recommendation: Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 should be Denied as moot, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 2 should be denied without prejudice, Application for Leave to Proceed IFP 1 should be denied as moot. The parties sh all have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file a response to the objections. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 10/21/2010. Signed on 10/6/2010 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (dkj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shell v. Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandon Shell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Warden J.E. Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?