Blocker v. Premo
Plaintiff: Tyrone Blocker
Defendant: J. Premo
Case Number: 1:2010cv01411
Filed: November 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Medford Office
Presiding Judge: Mark D. Clarke
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 4 . This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed on 3/14/2011 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Findings & Recommendation: Complaint 1 should be dismissed. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 2/7/2011. Signed on 1/18/2011 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (dkj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blocker v. Premo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Blocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Premo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?