Roach v. Snook et al
| Thomas Roach |
| Northwest Trustee Service, Inc., CitiMortgage and John Snook |
| 1:2014cv00583 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford (1) Office |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER: Granting Motion to Dismiss 49 ; Granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 49 ; Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 49 ; Granting Motion to Dismiss Case f or Lack of Jurisdiction 53 ; Granting 53 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting Request for Judicial Notice 54 ; Granting in part and Denied in part Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice 63 ; Denied as Moot Motion for J oinder 55 ; Denied as Moot Motion to Dismiss 56 ; Denying Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Petition 58 ; Denied as Moot 71 Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party ; Denied as Moot Motion for Leave 72 . (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed on 1/5/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: Denying Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 28 . Signed on 9/24/2014 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm)
|
|
Filing
8
Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 4 is DENIED. Signed on 4/11/2014 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
