Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians |
1:2014mc00324 |
August 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Medford (1) Office |
Owen M. Panner |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: Finding as Moot Motion to Intervene 6 . My previously issued Order of September 17, 2014 (#4) shall be amended as follows: Intervenor Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon shall be permitted to participate in the deposition of Dr. Stephen Dow Beckham and shall be permitted to cross-examine the witness. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/8/2015 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jkm) Modified on 1/8/2015 (jkm). To reflect opinion. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians | |
Represented By: | Dirk E. Doyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.