Durham et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
| Mary Durham and Nash Durham |
| Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. and The Bank Of New York Mellon |
| 1:2015cv00734 |
| April 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford (1) Office |
| Mark D. Clarke |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
Judgment. Based on the stipulation of the parties 23 , this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs and attorney fees. See formal Judgment. Signed on 6/30/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 2 is GRANTED. From the date and time of this Order, Defendants are hereby enjoined from proceeding with a non-judicial foreclosure sale of Plaintiffs' property for four teen (14) days. Plaintiffs shall not be required to provide a bond. Plaintiffs shall serve all Defendants with a copy of this Order forthwith and provide proof of service to the Court. Preliminary Injunction Hearing is set for 5/19/2015 at 02:30PM in Eugene Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken to determine whether this injunction should continue until final resolution of Plaintiffs' claims. See formal ORDER. Signed on 5/7/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
