Todd v. McMahn et al
| John H Todd |
| Klamath County, Klamath County Animal Control and Gale A McMahn |
| 1:2015cv01091 |
| June 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Medford (1) Office |
| Michael J. McShane |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
Order regarding Referral Notice, 109 : Because Plaintiff's appeal is frivolous, Plaintiff's IFP status is revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). The clerk is directed to mail the Ninth Circuit and Plaintiff a copy of this Order. Signed on 12/20/2022 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/20/2022.) (cp)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 68 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant Gale A. McMahn's Pleadings 71 is denied. Signed on 11/9/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment 53 and to Disqualify Judge Michael J. McShane 52 are denied. Signed on 3/1/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 40 is denied. Signed on 1/19/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
