Juarez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Juarez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Juarez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Orian Lisa Juarez
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2015cv01820
Filed:	September 25, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Medford (1) Office
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 6, 2017	Filing 35 ORDER FOR EAJA ATTORNEY FEES: Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $7,144.04. Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 139 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), payment of this award shall be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney: Arthur Stevens, c/o Alan Graf, PC, 208 Pine St., Floyd VA 24091. Signed on 3/6/2017 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (kms)
January 9, 2017	Filing 30 OPINION and ORDER - The Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, and is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of January, 2017, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 6, 2017

Filing 35 ORDER FOR EAJA ATTORNEY FEES: Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $7,144.04. Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 139 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), payment of this award shall be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney: Arthur Stevens, c/o Alan Graf, PC, 208 Pine St., Floyd VA 24091. Signed on 3/6/2017 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (kms)

January 9, 2017

Filing 30 OPINION and ORDER - The Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, and is therefore REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of January, 2017, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juarez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Janice E. Hebert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orian Lisa Juarez
Represented By:	Black Chapman Webber & Stevens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?