Moulin et al v. City of Central Point et al
Joshua Moulin |
Kristine Allison, Michael Anderson, City of Central Point, Brian Day, Darin Lux and Darin Tweedt |
1:2017cv00857 |
June 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Medford (1) Office |
Mark D. Clarke |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 180 ORDER: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke's Findings and Recommendation 163 is adopted in full. The parties have thirty days to 8/4/2022 to consent to a trial before a magistrate judge. If the parties do not consent, the case will be reassigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Order denying sanctions 162 is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) |
Filing 49 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendants Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in Judge Clarkes Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order in which to file an amended complaint, should he choose to do so. Amended Complaint is due 6/1/2018. Signed on 5/2/2018 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) Modified on 5/2/2018 (cp). |
Filing 29 ORDER: The Court has considered Defendants Objections to Magistrate Judges Order 27 , reviewed the record, and finds no error in Judge Clarkes Order. Signed on 12/27/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.