Wiedrich v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Wiedrich v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Wiedrich v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Timothy Joseph Wiedrich
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2017cv01041
Filed:	July 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Medford (1) Office
Presiding Judge:	Stacie F. Beckerman
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2020	Filing 35 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the contingency fee agreement in place between Timothy Wiedrich and his counsel is within the statutory limits provided in 29 U.S.C. §406 (b), and that the fee provided therein (as voluntarily reduced by Wiedrich's counsel) is reasonable. The motion 30 for approval of Section 406(b) fees is not opposed by Defendant and is therefore granted, and payment to Wiedrich's counsel of $4,200.10 from Wiedrich's retroactive fee award is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (pjg)
December 26, 2018	Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 26 in full. I REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings. Signed on 12/26/18 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2020

Filing 35 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the contingency fee agreement in place between Timothy Wiedrich and his counsel is within the statutory limits provided in 29 U.S.C. §406 (b), and that the fee provided therein (as voluntarily reduced by Wiedrich's counsel) is reasonable. The motion 30 for approval of Section 406(b) fees is not opposed by Defendant and is therefore granted, and payment to Wiedrich's counsel of $4,200.10 from Wiedrich's retroactive fee award is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (pjg)

December 26, 2018

Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 26 in full. I REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings. Signed on 12/26/18 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wiedrich v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Janice E. Hebert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Joseph Wiedrich
Represented By:	Marlene R. Yesquen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?