Rust-Oleum Corporation v. NIC Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION
Defendant: NIC Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01655
Filed: September 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Amended Response to Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(E) #15 Oral Argument requested. Filed by NIC Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2) (Paradis, David)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Declaration of Brian Hall in Support of Defendant's Response to Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(E). Filed by NIC Industries, Inc.. (Related document(s): Response to Motion #18 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Paradis, David)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Response to Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(E) #15 Oral Argument requested. Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2) (Paradis, David)
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement . Filed by Rust-Oleum Corporation. (Heil, Brendan)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Defendants. (Paradis, David)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(E). Oral Argument requested. Filed by Rust-Oleum Corporation. (Courser, D.)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Return of Service Executed as to NIC Industries, Inc. served on 9/17/2018, answer due on 10/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Courser, D.)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for December 17, 2018 at 9:00 AM. The Court will provide a teleconference number in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. Under LR 26.1(b) a written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Counterclaim All Plaintiffs. Filed by NIC Industries, Inc.. (Paradis, David)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Colleen M. O'neil (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: cmoneil. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (jkm)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notification of CM/ECF Account for Brendan L. Heil (Pro Hac Vice admission). Your login is: blheil. Go to #the CM/ECF login page to set your password. (jkm)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Colleen M. O'neil for Rust-Oleum Corporation. Application Fee in amount of $300 collected. Receipt No. 0979-5551659 issued. Signed on 9/14/2018 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Brendan L. Heil for Rust-Oleum Corporation. Application Fee in amount of $300 collected. Receipt No. 0979-5551667 issued. Signed on 9/14/2018 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to NIC Industries, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery order,, #5 . Dispositive Motions are due by 2/11/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 1/11/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/11/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 2/11/2019. Dispositive motions are due 2/11/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brendan L. Heil . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5551667. Filed by RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION. (Courser, D.)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Colleen M. O'Neil . Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5551659. Filed by RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION. (Courser, D.)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION. (Courser, D.)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint. for Declaratory Judgment and Damages Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5550793 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION against NIC Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sales Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Settlement Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - 8-14-18 Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons). (Courser, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rust-Oleum Corporation v. NIC Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NIC Industries, Inc.
Represented By: David B. Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION
Represented By: D. Jeffrey Courser
Represented By: Colleen M. O'neil
Represented By: Brendan L. Heil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?