S.W. v. State of Oregon et al
| S. W. and Suzanne Mendelson |
| Cindy Laird, State of Oregon and Diane Bowers |
| 1:2019cv00715 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for July 8, 2019 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. Under LR 26.1(b) a written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 5 Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Barton, William) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) with Jury Demand . Filed by Diane Bowers, State of Oregon, Cindy Laird. (Pierson, Dirk) |
|
Filing 3
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery order, #2 . Dispositive Motions are due by 10/7/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 9/5/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/7/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 10/7/2019. Dispositive motions are due 10/7/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 19CV14047 from Jackson. Filing Fee in amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5843365 issued.. Filed by Diane Bowers, Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS), Cindy Laird (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10). (Pierson, Dirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
