Kirk v. Butler et al
Theodore Martin Kirk |
Adam Delph, Dale Boring, Nick Kennedy, Juan Gonzalez, Nichole Houchins, Mark Clarke and Brian Butler |
1:2019cv01427 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Michael J McShane |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT:. Based on the record, this action is dismissed. Signed on 10/15/2019 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/15/2019.) (cp) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted, and his claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed on 10/15/2019 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/15/2019.) (cp) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/10/19.) (eo) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 9/6/2019.) (jkm) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Theodore Martin Kirk. (jkm) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Theodore Martin Kirk against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (jkm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.