Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New China, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| New China, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00277 |
| February 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan. Filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Healy, Teri) |
Filing 12
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 6/19/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 11 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. |
|
Filing 10
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 05/11/2020 at 10:00 AM Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. Under LR 26.1(b) a written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by New China, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document, #2 Proposed Document) (Osaka, Gordon) |
|
Filing 8
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Affidavit of Service #7 .New China, Inc. Answer is due by 3/20/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 7 Affidavit of Service upon New China, Inc. served on 2/28/2020 Filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Healy, Teri) |
| Filing 6 (Amended)Summons Issued Electronically as to New China, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm) |
| Filing 5 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Stanley, John) |
| Filing 4 ***STRICKEN***Summons Issued Electronically as to New China, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm) Modified on 2/20/2020 (jkm). An incorrect District Court was depicted on this summons and shall not issue. Counsel has amended. |
|
Filing 3
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery order, #2 . Dispositive Motions are due by 7/20/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/19/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 7/20/2020. Pretrial Order is due by 7/20/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. (statutory fee exempt status selected) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against New China, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Stanley, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New China, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Roberta L. Steele |
| Represented By: | John F. Stanley |
| Represented By: | Teri L. Healy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New China, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gordon Lee Osaka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
