Hayes v. State of Oregon et al
| Francis Steffan Hayes |
| State of Oregon and Kate Brown |
| 1:2020cv01332 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #17 Notice. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The document was missing a case caption cover page. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF that includes a case caption cover page has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment. (eo)
|
|
Filing 17
Notice re Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 , Objection #14 , Motion to Recuse, Motion for Reconsideration #11 Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Related document(s): Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 , Objection #14 , Motion to Recuse, Motion for Reconsideration #11 .) (Hayes, Francis) (Main Document 17 replaced on 9/3/2020) (eo).
|
|
Filing 16
Order from USCA for the 9th Circuit, USCA # 20-35736 re Notice of Appeal - Preliminary Injunction #15 . The August 20, 2020 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending August 13, 2020 motion for reconsideration. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. (jkm)
|
|
USCA Case Number and Notice confirming Docketing Record on Appeal re Notice of Appeal - Preliminary Injunction #15 . Case Appealed to 9TH Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 20-35736 assigned. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 15
Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit Filing fee $505 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7135167. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 14
Objection(s) . Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Related document(s): Motion for Preliminary Injunction #13 , Motion to Recuse #12 , Motion to Recuse, Motion for Reconsideration #11 , Opinion and Order #9 .) (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 13
Motion for Preliminary Injunction . Oral Argument requested.Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 12
Motion to Recuse . Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 11
Motion to Recuse , Motion for Reconsideration of Motion for Preliminary Injunction #8 . Oral Argument requested.Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued Electronically as to Kate Brown, State of Oregon. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER AND OPINION: Plaintiff's motion for a TRO #1 and Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction #8 are DENIED. Signed on 8/12/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing 8
Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction . Oral Argument requested.Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (Hayes, Francis)
|
|
Filing 7
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #6 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 12/10/2020. Dispositive Motions are due by 1/11/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/10/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/11/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 1/11/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting #3 Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 4
Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #1 . Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (jkm)
|
|
Filing fee in amount of $400.00 collected; Receipt No. 4201 issued. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 3
Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/7/2020.) (jkm)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint and Motion for TRO Jury Trial Requested: Filing fee $400.00 paid 8/12/2020, Receipt #4201, Civil Cover Sheet filed 8/12/2020 Filed by Francis Steffan Hayes against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Attachment). (jkm) Modified on 8/12/2020 (jkm). To update fee paid status and JS44 filed.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
