Mize v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Jeffrey Michael Mize |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv01700 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 10/30/2020, answer due on 3/1/2021. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear, Attorney Edward A. Wicklund for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Mize Pro Hac Vice #3 . Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 4
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7303123. Filed by Jeffrey Michael Mize. (Attachments: #1 Attachment List of admitted courts) (Bordelon, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Jeffrey Michael Mize. (Bordelon, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Jeffrey Michael Mize against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit "A" - Appeals Council denial). (Bordelon, Jeremy)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7303123 #3 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jkm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mize v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Michael Mize | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy L. Bordelon |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
