LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC v. Evanston Insurance Company
| LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC |
| Evanston Insurance Company |
| 1:2020cv02225 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 . Dieter J. Juedes on behalf of LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #9 . David H. Timmins on behalf of LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 12
Confirming Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Order, 11 . Answer is due by 2/26/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 11
Minute Order: regarding Acceptance/Acknowledgment of Service, #7 . The Court construes the Acceptance (#7) as a stipulated motion for extension of time to file an Answer or other Responsive pleading. The Motion is granted. The Answer is due 2/26/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 10
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Dieter J. Juedes. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7842628. Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. (Juedes, Dieter)
|
|
Filing 9
Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney David H Timmins. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7842604. Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. (Timmins, David)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney David H Timmins. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7842604 #9 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jkm)
|
|
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Dieter J. Juedes. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7842628 #10 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 8
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Acceptance/Acknowledgment of Service, #7 .Evanston Insurance Company Answer is due by 2/11/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 7
Acceptance/Acknowledgement of Service of Complaint, #1 on Evanston Insurance Company served on 1/21/2021 (togerther w/Corp. Disclosure Statement #2 ; Notice of Case Assignment #3 ; Scheduling Order 4 ; and Summons #6 Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. (Farnell, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued Electronically as to Evanston Insurance Company. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. (Farnell, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #3 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 4/21/2021. Dispositive Motions are due by 5/21/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/21/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/21/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 5/21/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC. (Farnell, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7665111 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC against Evanston Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet). (Farnell, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC v. Evanston Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LiquidAgents Healthcare LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Farnell |
| Represented By: | Jason M. Gauss |
| Represented By: | David H Timmins |
| Represented By: | Dieter J Juedes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Evanston Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
