Daniels v. Taylor
| Rakeema Gerrell Daniels |
| Michael Taylor |
| 1:2021cv00050 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO DISMISS: The Court DISMISSES plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 2/26/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/2/2021.) (joha)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT INMATE FILING FEE: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #5 ) is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections, Central Trust Unit shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court in accordance with the formula set forth above until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this order to DOC - Central Trust, P.O. Box 14400, Salem, OR 97309. Signed on 2/26/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se and ODOC party on 3/2/2021.) (joha)
|
| Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Rakeema Gerrell Daniels. (joha) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Rakeema Gerrell Daniels. (joha) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must submit the $400.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send plaintiff a form application to proceed in forma pauperis with this order. Signed on 1/14/2021 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (IFP Form and this Order Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/14/2021.) (joha)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/13/2021.) (jkm) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID) Filed by Rakeema Gerrell Daniels against Michael Taylor. (jkm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels v. Taylor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rakeema Gerrell Daniels | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
