Klamath Forest Alliance v. Blower et al
Klamath Forest Alliance |
Merv George, Jr., Forest Service, Scott Blower, Scott J. Blower and United States Forest Service |
1:2021cv00781 |
May 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Environmental Matters |
5 U.S.C. § 706 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 This filing includes a conventionally filed Thumb Drive. This conventional filing is maintained in the Clerk's Office but cannot be made a part of the court's electronic record in CM/ECF., Administrative Record. Filed by All Defendants. (ecp) |
Filing 15 Administrative Record . Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Abernathy Decl., #2 AR Index) (Perez, Krystal-Rose) |
Filing 14 MINUTES of Proceedings: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held. Answer due date remains as set on 08/13/2021. A telephonic Oral Argument is set for 10/26/2021 at 02:00PM before Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Teleconference information to be provided in a separate entry. Meriel Darzen and Oliver Stiefel present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Krystal-Rose Perez present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Hearing was not recorded. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 13 Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule #11 . The telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 07/06/2021 at 9:00 AM has been RESET for 7/6/2021 at 10:30AM in Medford by telephone before Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Conference call information remains the same as previously provided. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 12 Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule #11 . Amended Complaint is due 7/30/2021. Answer is due 8/13/2021. Any motions to intervene are due 7/2/2021. Administrative Record to be lodged by 7/23/2021. Any objections are due by 8/6/2021. Supplemental AR is due 8/13/2021. Briefing on cross motions for summary judgment shall be due as follows: Plaintiffs opening brief due 8/20/2021. Defendants combined cross-motion and response due 9/10/2021. Plaintiffs combined response/reply due 10/1/2021. Defendants reply due 10/15/2021. Intervening parties briefs, if any, shall be set according to the parties preferences unless good cause is shown for an extension. The Court notes Defendants request to waive the filing of an answer. A telephonic phone conference will be held on 07/06/2021 at 9:00 AM so that both parties may be heard on the issue without the need for the filing of a formal motion. Parties should also have their calendars available at that phone conference to set the Oral Argument Hearing on the cross motions for summary judgment. Conference call information to be provided in a separate entry. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 11 Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule . Filed by All Defendants. (Perez, Krystal-Rose) |
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service upon All Defendants Filed by Klamath Forest Alliance. (Stiefel, Oliver) |
Filing 9 Corrected Notice of Appearance of Krystal-Rose Perez appearing on behalf of All Defendants . Filed by Scott J. Blower, Merv George, Jr, United States Forest Service. (Perez, Krystal-Rose) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance of Krystal-Rose Perez appearing on behalf of Scott J. Blower, Merv George, Jr, United States Forest Service . Filed by Scott J. Blower, Merv George, Jr, United States Forest Service. (Perez, Krystal-Rose) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States Forest Service. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rsm) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merv George, Jr. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rsm) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Scott J. Blower. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rsm) |
Filing 4 Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 9/23/2021. Dispositive Motions are due by 10/25/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/23/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/25/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 10/25/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Klamath Forest Alliance. (Darzen, Meriel) |
Filing 1 Complaint. (fee paid $402-AORDC-8091902) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Klamath Forest Alliance against Klamath Forest Alliance (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Blower, #3 Proposed Summons George, #4 Proposed Summons USFS). (Darzen, Meriel) Modified on 5/26/2021 (rsm) to correct IFP to fee paid. Docket entry regenerated. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.