Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. v. ANM, Inc.
| Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. |
| ANM, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01154 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Amended Answer to #1 Complaint,,, with Jury Demand , Amended Counterclaim All Plaintiffs. Filed by ANM, Inc.. (Mackey, Michael) |
Filing 20
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. Amended Answer is due by 9/21/2021. Responsive pleading or Motion due within 14 days of the filing of Amended Answer. Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #17 . Michael C. Mackey on behalf of ANM, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Michael Cole Mackey. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8236001 #17 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jkm) |
| Filing 18 Joint Stipulation setting schedule to amend Answer by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Owens, Ryan) |
| Filing 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Michael Cole Mackey. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8236001. Filed by ANM, Inc.. (Mackey, Michael) |
|
Filing 16
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for November 15, 2021 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by ANM, Inc.. (DeCristo, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 Answer to #1 Complaint,,, with Jury Demand Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Counterclaim Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. Filed by ANM, Inc.. (DeCristo, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #11 Affidavit of Service. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The document was missing a case caption cover page. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (cw) |
|
Filing 12
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Affidavit of Service #11 .ANM, Inc. Answer is due by 8/31/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 11 Affidavit of Service upon ANM, Inc. served on 8/10/2021 Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. (Owens, Ryan) (Main Document 11 replaced on 8/12/2021) (cw). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #8 . Ryan R. Owens appearing on behalf of Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 9 Patent Report:(Amended) This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. (jkm) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Ryan Owens. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8186647 #8 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jkm) |
| Filing 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Ryan Owens. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8186647. Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. (Owens, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to ANM, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm) |
| Filing 6 Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent.. (jkm) |
|
Filing 5
Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #4 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 12/7/2021. Dispositive Motions are due by 1/6/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/7/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/6/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 1/6/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. (McGovern, Tracy) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. (McGovern, Tracy) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8184146 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Included patents/trademarks: 9,144,751--9/29/2015--Gene Pool Technologies, Inc., 9,145,532--9/29/2015--Gene Pool Technologies, Inc., 9,587,203--3/7/2017--Gene Pool Technologies, Inc., 9,604,155--3/28/2017--Gene Pool Technologies, Inc., 9,757,664--9/12/2017--Gene Pool Technologies, Inc.. Filed by Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. against ANM, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet). (McGovern, Tracy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. v. ANM, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Tracy M. McGovern |
| Represented By: | Ryan Owens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANM, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Cole Mackey |
| Represented By: | Blake Marvis |
| Represented By: | Joshua S. DeCristo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
