Smith v. City of Medford et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Smith
Defendant: City of Medford and Jason Becker
Case Number: 1:2022cv00538
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mark D Clarke
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2022 Filing 7 First Amended Complaint . Filed by Jerry Smith against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service). (Dimitre, Thomas)
May 9, 2022 Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument requested. Filed by Jason Becker, City of Medford. (Wilson, Alicia)
April 8, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Jason Becker. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to City of Medford. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 8/8/2022. Dispositive Motions are due by 9/6/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 8/8/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 9/6/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 9/6/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint. For Violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8473793 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by jerry smith against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Document Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Document Proposed Summons). (Dimitre, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. City of Medford et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Smith
Represented By: Thomas N. Dimitre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Medford
Represented By: Alicia M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Becker
Represented By: Alicia M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?