Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ryonet Corporation et al
| Twin City Fire Insurance Company |
| Ryonet Corporation and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv01966 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Property Damage - Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: At the request of counsel, the Court is RESETTING the telephonic Rule 16 Conference from 03/20/2023 to 04/04/2023 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will remain the same. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
|
Filing 9
RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 03/20/2023 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
|
| Filing 8 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Ryonet Corporation. (McLellan, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 . Filed by Ryonet Corporation. (McLellan, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement - Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company's Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filed by Twin City Fire Insurance Company. (Brennan, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Demand for Jury Trial by Twin City Fire Insurance Company . Filed by Twin City Fire Insurance Company. (Brennan, Christopher) |
|
Filing 3
Scheduling Order regarding Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 . Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed by 4/20/2023. Dispositive Motions are due by 5/22/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 4/20/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/22/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 5/22/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (jkm)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV39892 from Jackson County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8763749 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Ryonet Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (McLellan, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
