Buchheim et al v. Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.
Plaintiff: Aaron Michael Buchheim and Racheal Tean Buchheim
Defendant: Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2023cv00190
Filed: February 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2023 Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.. (Paradis, David)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #6 . Answer is due by 3/31/2023. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
March 27, 2023 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by All Defendants. (Paradis, David)
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C. served on 3/3/2023, answer due on 3/24/2023. (Sutton, Matthew)
February 9, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jkm)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/9/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 7/10/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 7/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (jkm)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 2/9/2023 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
February 8, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8815241 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Aaron Michael Buchheim, Racheal Tean Buchheim against Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Mertens, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buchheim et al v. Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Michael Buchheim
Represented By: Christopher J. Mertens
Represented By: Matthew Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Racheal Tean Buchheim
Represented By: Christopher J. Mertens
Represented By: Matthew Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandsness, Brandsness & Rudd, P.C.
Represented By: David B. Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?