Christensen v. AllCare Health, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Shad Christensen
Defendant: AllCare Health, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Case Number: 1:2023cv00640
Filed: May 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #2 Civil Cover Sheet. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: An incorrect PDF was attached to the entry. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties. (cw)
May 2, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to AllCare Health, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd)
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 8/30/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 9/29/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 9/29/2023. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (bd)
May 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 5/2/2023 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
May 2, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons For Defendant AllCare Health, Inc. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hacke, Ray)
May 2, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint, #1 . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hacke, Ray) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/3/2023) (cw).
May 2, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. For Damages For Violation of Title VII and ORS 659A.030(1)(a), and For Aiding and Abetting Employment Discrimination in Violation of ORS 659A.030(1)(g) Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8917934 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Shad Christensen against All Defendants. (Hacke, Ray) Modified on 5/2/2023 to correct docket text to reflect proper filed "against" party. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated to the parties. (bd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christensen v. AllCare Health, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shad Christensen
Represented By: Ray D. Hacke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AllCare Health, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?